Fluorescents are better than incandescent, but LED are even better, right? Right. I mean, even though LED lights are expensive, they last practically forever. That’s good, right?
I told Pierre that. He asked for the prices, the life of each type of bulb, and the equivalent wattage of each.
So here is our comparison:
60 watt incadescent light for $2 each, with a lifespan of 1000 hours
14 watt fluorescent light for $4 each, with a lifespan of 8000 hours
6 watt LED light for $50 each, with a lifespan of 100,000 hours
1000 hours is 41 days with the light on 24/7, or 334 days with the light on for 3 hours a day. We figured it at 11 cents per kilowatt hour.
After 1000 hours:
- you have to replace the incandescent light bulb, which has cost you $6.60 in electricity
- the cost of the fluorescent light bulb plus the amount of electricity used to run it, has still been less than the cost of the incandescent
- the LED has cost practically nothing in electricity, just 66 cents, but oh, my goodness, it cost $50 to buy!
After 7000 hours:
- you’ve had to buy 7 incandescent lights, plus they have cost you $46.20 in electricity
- the fluorescent has cost you $10.78 in electricity; if we factor in the cost of all of the incandescent bulbs ($10) plus their electrical cost ($46.20), plus the cost of the fluorescent bulb($4) and its electricity, you have a savings of $45.42
-the LED has only cost you $4.62 in electricity; if we factor in the cost of all of the incandescent bulbs ($10) plus their electrical cost ($46.20), plus the cost of the LED bulb($50) and its electricity ($4.62), you finally begun to save money – $5.58
After 33,000 hours (about 22 years!!!):
- you’ve had to buy 33 incandescent lights at $2 each ($66), plus they’ve cost $217 in electricity
- the fluorescent has cost $50.82 in electricity, and have had to be replaced 5 times; factoring in the same costs as before, you have a total savings of $212.98
- you still haven’t had the replace the LED, and it has cost a total of $21.78 in electricity. At this point, you have finally reached equivalent savings to the fluorescent light bulbs.
Now, of course, anyone looking at this may be tempted to say that even the $217 for incandescent is a small amount, especially over 22 years. However, think for a little about just how many lights are on in your house. Ya thinking? Yea ….. To get a better average, take these figures and multiply them by half of the lightbulbs in your house, and you’ll probably get a closer estimate of how much they’re costing you.
So are fluorescent better than incandescent? Most definitely. Within a year, they pay for themselves. The price is going down all the time, and the technology is constantly improving. They are no longer the flickery, headache-inducing monstrosities that I remember from my teen years. Of course, they’re not perfect for all locations. If you like to apply makeup in front of your bathroom mirror, you might prefer an incandescent there. Personally, I’ve never noticed the greenish tint that some people speak about. Maybe I’m just naturally a little off-color. Again, if the light is going to be turned on and off very quickly, you’re still best with the incandescent.
However, I can’t really see any use, at their current prices, for LED lights in the household. They’d probably make a great gift for young newlyweds – give them the gift of never, ever having to change lightbulbs. Ever.






